Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients having controlled office blood pressure

Background and objectives: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has become useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive individuals. In this study we tried to know the role of office and ambulatory BP in treated hypertensive patients. Methods and patients: Prospective cohort of 561 treated hypertensive patients were enrolled in the study. Hypertension definitions were according to JNC 8 classification. Office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring was done according to defined protocol. Results: From a subgroup of 158 treated hypertensive patients, 91(16.2%) patients were having white coat hypertension (p value 0.00 by Pearson chi square test). In a subset of 403 patients who were having controlled BP on the day of enrolment as well as on the day of attaching ambulatory BP monitor; 98 (17.4%) patients were having masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). In addition there was very significant percentage of non-dippers and reverse dippers. In our study we found that office BP has a moderate to low specificity and sensitivity and low negative predictive value for overall control in treated hypertensive patients. Conclusion: Ambulatory BP monitoring should be included in the management protocol of treated hypertensive patients, for the optimal BP control.

Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and self-blood pressure monitoring for diagnosing white coat hypertension amongst pregnant women

Background: White coat hypertension (WCH) is a common and well recognized phenomenon. It is also very prevalent amongst pregnant women and is often diagnosed as chronic/ gestational hypertension leading to unnecessary medications during pregnancy. ABPM is the gold standard for diagnosis of WCH. SBPM is an easy effective and reliable method to measure blood pressure but its efficacy needs to be tested and compared with ABPM in cases of WCH. It is important to compare the two methods in assessing WCH so SBPM can be utilized in cases of WCH, if found useful and efficacious.Methods: All pregnant women who presented to the ANC were screened for hypertension. Those who were diagnosed to be hypertensive in antenatal clinic and these patients were then admitted for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 hours and SBPM on 6 hourly bases for 5 days.Results: The ABPM and SBPB readings were noted, tabulated and compared. It was found that the prevalence of ‘WCH’ in this study using ABPM and SBPM were 47.368% (27/54) and 45.614% (26/54) respectively.Conclusions: The results in diagnosing WCH using ABPM and SBPM were comparable.

Office blood pressure combined with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertension diagnosis / 预防医学

Objective@#To evaluate the effects of office blood pressure(OBP)combined with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM)on the diagnosis of hypertension.@*Methods@#The residents aged 35-79 years without hypertension history,whose casual OBP were 120~159 mm Hg/80~99 mm Hg,were enrolled from 4 communities of Hangzhou and Zhuji from 2015 to 2018. They were performed OBP measurements on other two days in 4 weeks and ABPM in a week. There were 2 criteria of OBP as elevated OBP on the first day or in 3 different days,and 4 criteria of ABPM as elevated mean BP in 24 hours, daytime, nighttime and either of the above time. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was employed to evaluate the effects of different OBP criteria combined with ABPM criteria on the diagnosis of masked hypertension(MH)and white-coat hypertension(WCH).@* Results@#Taking 3-day-OBP as a golden standard,the 1-day-OBP with 4 ABPM criteria had the areas under the ROC curve(AUC)of 0.79-0.81,sensitivity of 57.58%-62.77% and specificity of 100.00% in MH;had the AUC of 0.95-0.98,sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 88.96%-96.80% in WCH. The Kappa values were all less than 0.6,known as low consistency. Taking either time of ABPM as a golden standard,24 hours,daytime and nighttime ABPM criteria with OBP had the AUC of 0.90-0.92,sensitivity of 79.17%-83.90% and specificity of 100.00% in MH(all Kappa>0.6),when with 1-day-OBP,the Kappa values were all more than 0.8,known as high consistency;had the AUC of 0.95-1.00,sensitivity of 100.00% and specificity of 89.54%-99.37% in WCH,the Kappa values of daytime ABPM were all more than 0.6,known as high consistency. @* Conclusions @# If limited by options, 1-day-OBP could be used instead of 3-day-OBP for detection of WCH or exclusion of MH yet with less accuracy; 24 hours or daytime ABPM instead of either time of ABPM was reliable.

Prevalence of white coat hypertension amongst pregnant women admitted with high BP recordings in ante-natal clinic

Background: White coat hypertension (WCH) is a common and well recognized phenomenon with significant prevalence amongst all age groups. This is also quite prevalent in the pregnant women with an intermediate long term prognosis between hypertensive and normo-tensive individuals. It is important to assess the true prevalence WCH in pregnant women and to prevent unnecessary medications to them during pregnancy but at the same time to keep a timely follow up and a watchful eye on these patients to identify complications at the earliest. Study was conducted at a peripheral secondary level hospital with a small obstetrics and gynecology OPD and ward. 54 patients were diagnosed to be hypertensive in Antenatal Clinic.Methods: All pregnant women who presented to the ANC were screened for hypertension. Those who were diagnosed to be hypertensive in antenatal clinic and these patients were then admitted for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for 24 hours.Results: The ABPM tracings were checked and tabulated to arrive at the final diagnosis after 24 hrs. The prevalence of ‘WCH’ in this study was 48.15% as 26/54 patients were found to have their average BP < 140/90 mmHg after measurement by ABPM over 24 hours so they were diagnosed as ‘White Coat Hypertension’ patients.Conclusions: Many women who come to ANC in the early pregnancy are diagnosed to have hypertension. WCH is a well known phenomenon in pregnancy. WCH must be ruled out prior to starting these patients on anti-hypertensive medications.

Hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) / Resistant arterial hypertension (RAH)

A hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) é definida quando a pressão arterial (PA) permanece acima das metas recomendadas com o uso de três anti-hipertensivos de diferentes classes, incluindo um bloqueador do sistema renina- angiotensina (inibidor da enzima conversora da angiotensina [IECA] ou bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina [BRA]), um bloqueador dos canais de cálcio (BCC) de ação prolongada e um diurético tiazídico (DT) de longa ação em doses máximas preconizadas e toleradas, administradas com frequência, dosagem apropriada e comprovada adesão. Nesta definição está incluído o subgrupo de pacientes hipertensos resistentes, cuja PA é controlada com quatro ou mais medicamentos anti-hipertensivos, chamada de HAR controlada (HAR-C). A classificação da doença em HAR-C e HAR não controlada (HAR-NC), incluindo a HAR refratária (HAR-Ref), um fenótipo extremo de HAR-NC em uso de cinco ou mais anti-hipertensivos, é uma proposta que ganha espaço na literatura. Diante da suspeita clínica de HAR, é necessário verificar a confirmação diagnóstica, e a primeira etapa na investigação é a exclusão das causas de pseudorresistência, tais como falta de adesão ao tratamento (farmacológico e não farmacológico), posologia inadequada, técnica imprópria de aferição da PA e efeito do avental branco. O MAPA e o monitoramento residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) são os exames para confirmação do controle inadequado da PA. Uma vez afastada a pseudorresistência, confirma-se a existência da HAR e inicia-se uma investigação diagnóstica com exames específicos, conforme a orientação das Diretrizes de Hipertensão em relação ao comprometimento de lesões em órgãos-alvo e hipertensão secundária. A ocorrência de comorbidades associadas deve ser detectada com exames especializados de acordo com a suspeita clínica. O objetivo do tratamento medicamentoso na HAR é detectar as causas do não controle e encontrar a melhor combinação de fármacos, visando o alcance das metas pressóricas com menor ocorrência de efeitos adversos e maior adesão. Em geral, busca-se otimizar o tratamento tríplice com os fármacos preferenciais, que são: IECA ou BRA, BCC di-hidropiridínico e DT.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) persistently above the recommended target values despite the use of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, including one blocker of the renin- angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI] or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), one long- acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), and one long-acting thiazide diuretic (TD) at maximum recommended and tolerated doses, administered with appropriate frequency and doses and with proven adherence. The definition above includes a subgroup of patients with RHTN whose BP is controlled with four or more antihypertensive medications, known as controlled RHTN (C-RHTN). On clinical suspicion of RHTN, diagnostic confirmation is required, and the first step in the investigation is the exclusion of causes of pseudoresistance, such as lack of treatment adherence (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), inadequate dosing, improper BP measurement technique, and white-coat effect. Lack of BP control should be confirmed by ABPM and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Secondary hypertension (SecH) is defined as increased BP due to an identifiable cause. Patients with RH should be investigated for the most prevalent causes of "non-endocrine" and "endocrine" SecH after exclusion of use of medications that may interfere with BP values: antiinflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, nasal decongestants, appetite suppressants, antidepressants, immunosuppressants, erythropoietin, contraceptives, and illicit drugs. The objective of pharmacological treatment in RHTN is to identify the causes of lack of control and find the best combination of drugs, aiming at achieving the target BP with few adverse effects and greater adherence. In general, triple treatment optimization is attempted with preferred drugs, namely, ACEIs or ARBs, dihydropyridine CCBs, and TDs

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice

Being one of the most widely prevalent diseases throughout the world, hypertension has emerged as one of the leading causes of global premature morbidity and mortality. Hence, blood pressure (BP) measurements are essential for physicians in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend initiating antihypertensive medications on the basis of office BP readings. However, office BP readings provide a snapshot evaluation of the patient's BP, which might not reflect patient's true BP, with the possibility of being falsely elevated or falsely low. Recently, there is ample evidence to show that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a better predictor of major cardiovascular events than BP measurements at clinic settings. ABPM helps in reducing the number of possible false readings, along with the added benefit of understanding the dynamic variability of BP. This article will focus on the significance of ambulatory BP, its advantages and limitations compared with the standard office BP measurement and a brief outlook on its use and interpretation to diagnose and treat hypertension.

White-Coat Hypertension: the Neglected Subgroup in Hypertension

The clinical prognostic importance of white coat hypertension (WCH), that is, the clinical condition characterized by an increase of office but a normal ambulatory or home blood pressure (BP) is since a long time matter of considerable debate. WCH accounts for a consistent portion of hypertensive patients (up to 30–40%), particularly when hypertension is mild or age is more advanced. Although scanty and inconsistent information is available on the response of office and out-office BP to antihypertensive treatment and the cardiovascular (CV) protection provided by treatment, an increasing body of evidence focusing on the association of WCH with CV risk factors, subclinical cardiac and extra-cardiac organ damage and, more importantly, with CV events indicates that the risk entailed by this condition is intermediate between true normotension and sustained hypertension. This review will address a number of issues concerning WCH with particular attention to prevalence and clinical correlates, relation with subclinical target organ damage and CV morbidity/mortality, therapeutic perspectives. Several topics covered in this review are based on data acquired over the past 20 years by the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, a longitudinal survey performed by our group on the general population living in the surroundings of Milan area in the north part of Italy.

Discussion on using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnostic criteria of white coat and masked hypertension / 上海交通大学学报（医学版）

Objective • To investigate different methods on the diagnosis of white coat and masked phenomena in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Methods • Information of clinical characteristics and laboratory data were collected, and measurements of office blood pressure (OBP) and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in 274 subjects were performed, including 46 persons with high normal OBP (SBP/DBP 130-139/85-89 mmHg) (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), 187 untreated patients with grade 1 and grade 2 hypertension (SBP/DBP 140-179/90-109 mmHg), and 41 treated hypertensive patients. Differences of 95th and 5th percentile between OBP and daytime ABP, were respectively taken as the cutoff for the definition of white coat phenomenon and masked phenomenon. Results • If white coat and masked phenomenon were diagnosed according to the current hypertension guidelines, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon did not differ between untreated and treated hypertensive patients (11.2% vs 7.3%, P=0.460). In the untreated group, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon was higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 hypertension (20.0% vs 8.5%, P=0.033), whereas the prevalence of white coat hypertension did not differ (2.2% vs 7.0%, P=0.230). The prevalence of masked hypertension was 73.9% in high normal blood pressure group. The prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension was 4.9%. If the difference of 95th percentile (≥20.50/20.50 mmHg) and 5th percentile (≤-18.67/-6.00 mmHg) between OBP and daytime ABP were, respectively, used as the cutoff for the definition of white coat and masked phenomenon, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon did not differ between treated and untreated groups (12.2% vs 9.1%，P=0.543). In the untreated group, the prevalence of white coat phenomenon was higher in grade 2 than in grade 1 hypertension (24.4% vs 4.2%, P=0.000). The prevalence of masked phenomenon did not differ between persons with high normal OBP (15.2%) and untreated (5.9%) as well as treated hypertensive patients (12.2%) (P>0.05). Conclusion • The percentile methods may be useful for the diagnosis of white coat and masked phenomena.

Changes of serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test and their relationship with white coat hypertension / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To investigate the changes of serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test and their relationship with white coat hypertension .Methods A total of 48 patients with white coat hypertension in Liwan Hospital of Tra-ditional Chinese Medicine from January 2014 to August 2016 were selected as the study group ,30 cases of patients with common hypertension in the same period were selected as common group ,30 cases of healthy volunteers in the same period were selected as control group .All the objects in the three groups completed exercise stress test on an empty stomach ,sat on the power bicycle and pedaling 2 min with 200 W ,and after intermittent 5 min repeated exercise until extreme fatigue .Serum cortisol and IL-6 levels ,mean arterial pressure(MAP) of 3 groups before exercise ,immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise were detected and compared . Value of serum cortisol and IL-6 on diagnosing white coat hypertension and its relationship with MAP were analyzed .Results Compared with the control group ,serum cortisol ,IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group and common group before and after exer-cise were increased .Compared with the common group ,serum cortisol and IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group were significant-ly increased immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise (P<0 .05) .Compared with before exercise ,serum cortisol and IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise were increased(P<0 .05) .ROC curve analysis showed that it′s value to detecting serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test for diagnosing white coat hy-pertension ,in which the value of combined detection of serum cortisol and IL-6 immediately after exercise for diagnosing white coat hypertension was the best .Pearson linear correlation analysis showed that serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test were positively correlated with MAP of patients with white coat hypertension (r=0 .844 ,0 .802 ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion It′s value to detecting serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test for diagnosing white coat hypertension , which are related with blood pressure ,and could be used as reference indexes for the diagnosis and illness severity evaluation of white coat hypertension .

Changes of serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test and their relationship with white coat hypertension / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To investigate the changes of serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test and their relationship with white coat hypertension .Methods A total of 48 patients with white coat hypertension in Liwan Hospital of Tra-ditional Chinese Medicine from January 2014 to August 2016 were selected as the study group ,30 cases of patients with common hypertension in the same period were selected as common group ,30 cases of healthy volunteers in the same period were selected as control group .All the objects in the three groups completed exercise stress test on an empty stomach ,sat on the power bicycle and pedaling 2 min with 200 W ,and after intermittent 5 min repeated exercise until extreme fatigue .Serum cortisol and IL-6 levels ,mean arterial pressure(MAP) of 3 groups before exercise ,immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise were detected and compared . Value of serum cortisol and IL-6 on diagnosing white coat hypertension and its relationship with MAP were analyzed .Results Compared with the control group ,serum cortisol ,IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group and common group before and after exer-cise were increased .Compared with the common group ,serum cortisol and IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group were significant-ly increased immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise (P<0 .05) .Compared with before exercise ,serum cortisol and IL-6 levels and MAP of the study group immediately after exercise and 3 h after exercise were increased(P<0 .05) .ROC curve analysis showed that it′s value to detecting serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test for diagnosing white coat hy-pertension ,in which the value of combined detection of serum cortisol and IL-6 immediately after exercise for diagnosing white coat hypertension was the best .Pearson linear correlation analysis showed that serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test were positively correlated with MAP of patients with white coat hypertension (r=0 .844 ,0 .802 ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion It′s value to detecting serum cortisol and IL-6 levels before and after exercise stress test for diagnosing white coat hypertension , which are related with blood pressure ,and could be used as reference indexes for the diagnosis and illness severity evaluation of white coat hypertension .

Discrepancies in Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Blood pressure (BP) control is considered the most important treatment for preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and associated cardiovascular complications. However, clinic BP is insufficient to diagnose hypertension (HT) and to monitor overall BP control because it does not correlate well with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We enrolled 387 hypertensive CKD patients (stages G1–G4, 58.4% male with median age 61 years) from 3 hospitals in Korea. HT of clinic BP and ABPM was classified as ≥ 140/90 and ≥ 130/80 mmHg, respectively. Clinic BP control rate was 60.2%. The median 24-hour systolic blood pressures (SBPs) of CKD G3b and CKD G4 were significantly higher than those of CKD G1–2 and CKD G3a. However, the median 24-hour SBPs were not different between CKD G1–2 and CKD G3a or between CKD G3b and CKD G4. Of all patients, 5.7%, 38.0%. 42.3%, and 14.0% were extreme-dippers, dippers, non-dippers, and reverse-dippers, respectively. Non-/reverse-dippers independently correlated with higher Ca × P product, higher intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and lower albumin. Normal BP was 33.3%, and sustained, masked, and white-coat HT were 29.7%, 26.9%, and 10.1%, respectively. White-coat HT independently correlated with age ≥ 61 years and masked HT independently correlated with CKD G3b/G4. In conclusion, ABPM revealed a high prevalence of non-/reverse-dippers and sustained/masked HT in Korean CKD patients. Clinicians should try to obtain a CKD patient's ABPM, especially among those who are older or who have advanced CKD as well as those with abnormal Ca × P product, iPTH, and albumin.

The significance of blood pressure variation and metabolic risk factors in patients with different stages of hypertension / 고신대학교의과대학학술지

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variation (BPV) and metabolic syndrome is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood Pressure (ABP) has been shown to be more closely related to cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients than conventional office BP (OBP). Using both OBP and ABP, 4 groups of patients were identified: (1) normotensive patients (NT); (2) white coat hypertensives (WCHT); (3) masked hypertensives (MHT); and (4) sustainedhypertensives (SHT). We investigated the significance of BPV and metabolic risks of these 4 groups. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients between January 2008 and May 2013. Echocardiography and 24 hour ABP monitoring were performed. RESULTS: BMI was significantly higher in the MHT compared with the NT. There were progressive increases in fasting glucose level from NT to WCHT, MHT, and SHT.MHT and SHT had higher 24h and nighttime BPV than NT.MHT was significantly related with BMI (r = 0.139, P = 0.010), creatinine (r = 0.144, P = 0.018), fasting glucose (r = 0.128, P = 0.046), daytime systolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017), and daytime diastolic BPV (r = 0.130, P = 0.017). Dyslipidemia (r = 0.110, P = 0.043), nighttime systolic BPV (r = 0.241, P < 0.001) and nighttime diastolic BPV (r = 0.143, P = 0.009) shown correlation with SHT. In multivariate logistic regression, MHT was independently associated with Body mass index (OR 1.086, 95% CI 1.005–1.174, P = 0.038) and creatinine (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.010, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: BPV and metabolic risk factors were found to be greater in MHT and SHT compared with NT and WCHT. This suggests that BPV and metabolic risks may contribute to the elevated cardiovascular risk observed in patients with MHT and SHT.

Aspectos clínicos actuales del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial / Current clinical aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Resumen La hipertensión arterial sistémica es la enfermedad de mayor prevalencia a nivel mundial que incrementa de forma importante el riesgo cardiovascular. Un diagnóstico temprano, junto al logro de metas, disminuye de forma importante el riesgo de complicaciones. Recientemente se han actualizado los criterios diagnósticos para la hipertensión, así como la introducción del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial. La introducción en la práctica clínica del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial fue para ayudar al diagnóstico de la "hipertensión de bata blanca" y la "hipertensión enmascarada". En la actualidad también se ha demostrado que el monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial es superior al método tradicional de registro de presión arterial en el consultorio, tanto para el diagnóstico como para el adecuado control y ajuste del tratamiento farmacológico. Además se han introducido nuevos conceptos de suma importancia como la hipertensión arterial nocturna aislada, la elevación matutina alterada de la presión arterial y los patrones alterados de descenso nocturno de la presión arterial; los cuales se han asociado a un incremento de riesgo cardiovascular. Varios estudios han mostrado relevante valor pronóstico en algunas poblaciones. Aún existen otros conceptos en los cuales hace falta un mayor estudio para establecer adecuadamente su introducción en la práctica clínica como la carga hipertensiva, la variabilidad, la presión de pulso y la rigidez arterial; además de establecer valores de acuerdo a más estudios clínicos en poblaciones como pacientes geriátricos y niños.

Abstract Systemic arterial hypertension is the prevalentest disease worldwide that significantly increases cardiovascular risk. An early diagnosis together to achieve goals decreases the risk of complications significatly. Recently have been updated the diagnostic criteria for hypertension and the introduction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The introduction into clinical practice of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was to assist the diagnosis of "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension". Today has also shown that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is better than the traditional method of recording blood pressure in the office, to the diagnosis and to adequate control and adjustment of drug treatment. Also there have been introduced important new concepts such as isloted nocturnal hypertension, morning blood pressure elevation altered and altered patterns of nocturnal dip in blood pressure; which have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Several studies have shown significant prognostic value in some stocks. There are still other concepts on which further study is needed to properly establish their introduction to clinical practice as hypertensive load variability, pulse pressure and arterial stiffness. In addition to setting values according to further clinical studies in populations such as elderly and children.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Five Decades of More Light and Less Shadows / Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial: Cinco Décadas de mais Luzes e Menos Sombras

Abstract Casual blood pressure measurements have been extensively questioned over the last five decades. A significant percentage of patients have different blood pressure readings when examined in the office or outside it. For this reason, a change in the paradigm of the best manner to assess blood pressure has been observed. The method that has been most widely used is the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring - ABPM. The method allows recording blood pressure measures in 24 hours and evaluating various parameters such as mean BP, pressure loads, areas under the curve, variations between daytime and nighttime, pulse pressure variability etc. Blood pressure measurements obtained by ABPM are better correlated, for example, with the risks of hypertension. The main indications for ABPM are: suspected white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, evaluation of the efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy in 24 hours, and evaluation of symptoms. There is increasing evidence that the use of ABPM has contributed to the assessment of blood pressure behaviors, establishment of diagnoses, prognosis and the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. There is no doubt that the study of 24-hour blood pressure behavior and its variations by ABPM has brought more light and less darkness to the field, which justifies the title of this review.

Resumo Nas últimas cinco décadas muito têm sido questionadas as medidas casuais da pressão arterial (PA). Significativa porcentagem de pacientes apresenta PA muito diversa quando examinados na clínica ou fora dela. Por isso, é hoje observada uma mudança de paradigma com relação ao melhor modo de se avaliar a PA. O método que mais se consolidou é a Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial - MAPA. É possível obter-se o registro de medidas de PA durante 24 horas avaliando-se vários parâmetros como: médias de PA, cargas de pressão, áreas sob as curvas, variações entre vigília e sono, variabilidade de pressão de pulso etc. As medidas de PA obtidas pela MAPA são mais bem correlacionadas, por exemplo, com os riscos da hipertensão arterial. As principais indicações para a MAPA são: suspeita de hipertensão do avental branco e da hipertensão mascarada, avaliação da eficácia terapêutica nas 24 horas e avaliação de sintomas. Crescem as evidências de que o emprego da MAPA contribui para avaliar os comportamentos da PA, estabelecer diagnósticos, prognóstico e avaliar a eficácia terapêutica anti-hipertensiva. Sem dúvidas, o estudo do comportamento da PA e suas variações durante as 24 horas pela MAPA nos deixaram com menos sombras e mais luzes, e justifica o título desta revisão.

Higher Blood Pressure Variability in White Coat Hypertension; from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variability (BPV) was recently shown to be a risk factor of stroke. White coat hypertension (WCH) used to be regarded as innocuous, but one long-term follow-up study reported that WCH increased stroke rate compared to normotension (NT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between WCH and BPV. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1398 subjects from the Korean Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry, who were divided into NT (n=364), masked hypertension (n=122), white coat hypertension (n=254), and sustained hypertension (n=658) groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The average real variability (ARV), a highly sensitive BPV parameter, was highest in the WCH group, followed by the sustained hypertension, masked hypertension, and NT groups. The results persisted after being adjusted for covariates. The WCH vs. sustained hypertension results (adjusted mean±standard error) were as follows: 24-h systolic ARV, 22.9±0.8 vs. 19.4±0.6; 24-h diastolic ARV, 16.8±0.6 vs. 14.3±0.5; daytime systolic ARV, 21.8±0.8 vs. 16.8±0.6; and daytime diastolic ARV, 16.2±0.6 vs. 13.4±0.5 (p<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: From the registry data, we found that subjects with WCH or masked hypertension had higher BPV than NT. However, long-term follow-up data assessing the clinical influences of WCH on stroke are needed.

Hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper en embarazadas con hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco / Morning Hypertension and Non-dipper Behavior in Pregnant Women with White Coat Syndrome

Introducción: La hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco (HGB) es común en el embarazo, aunque su evolución clínica durante la gestación se conoce poco. La hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper, medidos por monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial (MAPA), se asocian con mayor riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares; no obstante ello, son escasos los estudios en la gestación. Objetivos: El objetivo primario del estudio fue evaluar la hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper en embarazadas con HGB versus un grupo control de normotensas. Se planteó como objetivo secundario evaluar si la HGB, la hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper en el segundo trimestre del embarazo se relacionan con mayor hipertensión sostenida en el tercer trimestre. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo en el que se incluyeron 95 primigestas en la semana 20 de gestación, 50 con HGB y 45 normotensas como grupo control. Se registraron laboratorio de rutina, presión de consultorio y MAPA en la inclusión y a las 32 semanas de gestación. La hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper se evaluaron por MAPA. Resultados: La edad, la glucemia y la presión diurna y nocturna por MAPA fueron similares en el examen basal en ambos grupos. Por el contrario, las pacientes con HGB presentaron valores significativamente superiores de hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper, lo cual se asoció en forma independiente con hipertensión sostenida en el tercer trimestre del embarazo. Conclusiones: Las gestantes con HGB en la semana 20 de embarazo presentaron mayor hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper y evolucionaron con más frecuencia a hipertensión sostenida que el grupo control de normotensas.

Background: White coat syndrome (WCS) is common during pregnancy, although little is known about its clinical outcome during gestation. Morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior, measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), are associated with greater risk of cardiovascular events. However, there are few studies during pregnancy. Objectives: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior in pregnant women with WCS versus a control normotensive group. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether WCS, morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior in the second trimester of pregnancy were associated with greater hypertension in the third trimester. Methods: This prospective study included 95 primiparae in the 20th week of gestation, 50 with WCS and 45 as normotensive control group. Routine lab tests, office blood pressure and ABPM at inclusion and in the 32th week of gestation were recorded. Morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior were evaluated by ABPM. Results: Age, and baseline blood glucose level and daytime and nighttime blood pressure by ABPM were similar in both groups. Conversely, patients presenting WCS had significantly higher values of morning hypertension and non-dipper behavior, which were independently associated with sustained hypertension in the third trimester of pregnancy. Conclusions: Pregnant women with WCS in the 20th week of gestation presented greater morning hypertension and non-dipper behavior and progressed more frequently to sustained hypertension than the control normotensive group.

Discordance between ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure according to global cardiovascular risk group

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The detection of white coat hypertension (WCH), treated normalized hypertension, and masked hypertension (MH) is important to improve the effectiveness of hypertension management. However, whether global cardiovascular risk (GCR) profile has any effect on the discordance between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) is unknown. METHODS: Data from 1,916 subjects, taken from the Korean Multicenter Registry for ABP monitoring, were grouped according to diagnostic and therapeutic thresholds for CBP and ABP (140/90 and 135/85 mmHg, respectively). GCR was assessed using European Society of Hypertension 2007 guidelines. RESULTS: The mean subject age was 54.1 ± 14.9 years, and 48.9% of patients were female. The discordancy rate between ABP and CBP in the untreated and treated patients was 32.5% and 26.5%, respectively (p = 0.02). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension and MH was 14.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Discordance between ABP and CBP was lower in the very high added-risk group compared to the moderate added-risk group (odds ratio [OR], 0.649; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487 to 0.863; p = 0.003). The prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension was also lower in the very high added-risk group (OR, 0.451; 95% CI, 0.311 to 0.655). CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between ABP and CBP was observed more frequently in untreated subjects than in treated subjects, and less frequently in the very high added-risk group, which was due mainly to the lower prevalence of WCH or treated normalized hypertension.

Circadian autonomic disturbance in resistant hypertension with and without white coat phenomenon / Distúrbios autonômicos do ritmo circadiano na hipertensão resistente com e sem o fenômeno do avental branco

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A definição de hipertensão arterial resistente inclui pacientes cuja pressão arterial permanece acima da meta apesar do uso de 3 classes de anti-hipertensivos bem como aqueles que usam 4 ou mais classes e possuem pressão controlada. A monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial é um método indispensável para o diagnóstico da hipertensão arterial resistente, excluindo a pseudorresistência, e classificar o hipertenso resistente em 2 grupos: hipertensão arterial resistente sem e com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil circadiano autonômico da hipertensão arterial resistente com e sem resposta ao fenômeno do avental-branco. MÉTODOS: Quarenta e quatro pacientes com hipertensão arterial resistente foram divididos em dois grupos: hipertensão arterial resistente com presença do fenômeno do avental-branco (n=25) e hipertensão arterial resistente sem presença do fenômeno do avental-branco (n=19). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à medida da pressão arterial de escritório, monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial e eletrocardiografia ambulatorial para análise da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca. RESULTADOS: Não foram observadas diferenças entre a hipertensão arterial resistente com e sem a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco em relação à idade, índice de massa corporal ou de gênero. No grupo de hipertensão arterial resistente com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco observou-se maior desequilíbrio autonômico avaliado por parâmetros da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca no domínio da frequência em comparação aos pacientes sem o fenômeno do avental-branco. Além disso, os parâmetros da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca noturnos no grupo da hipertensão arterial resistente com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco correlacionaram-se positivamente com a hipertensão arterial resistente e pressão de pulso de consultório (r=0,57, p<0,05 er=0,55, p<0,05, respectivamente)...

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current definition of resistant hypertension includes both patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled on three or more medications and those whose blood pressure is controlled when using four or more antihypertensive medications. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is an indispensable method to diagnose resistant hypertension and classify it into 2 groups: resistant hypertension without white-coat response and resistant hypertension with white-coat response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the circadian autonomic profile of resistant hypertension with and without white-coat phenomenon. METHODS: Forty four resistant hypertension patients were divided into two groups: resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon (n=25) and resistant hypertension without white-coat (n=19) phenomenon. All patients underwent office blood pressure measurement, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and 24-hour Holter monitoring. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon and resistant hypertension without white-coat phenomenon groups regarding age, body mass index or gender. The group of resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon had greater autonomic imbalance evaluated by heart rate variability parameters in frequency domain compared to resistant hypertension patients without white-coat phenomenon. Moreover, nighttime frequency domain parameters of resistant hypertension group with white-coat phenomenon correlated positively with office resistant hypertension and office pulse pressure (r=0.57, p<0.05 and r=0.55, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of the white-coat response in resistant hypertension patients implies worse autonomic imbalance...